Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

October 25, 2010

Quick Review of MS Office 2011 for Mac


Microsoft has announced the local availability of Office 2011 for Mac, which the company said comes with some important additions.
One of the additions to the new productivity suite is Outlook, which replaces the ill-received Entourage e-mail client in the previous version.
Outlook for Office 2011 features a combination of e-mail, calendar and contact management and is designed to be an all-in-one application for checking your e-mail and planning your schedule.
The other components of Office 2011 for Mac are WordExcel and PowerPoint, all of which come with new features.
Word 2011, for example, has a new full screen view mode, which is billed as a tool for taking away distractions when you need to get some serious work done.

It also supports Visual Basic scripting for accessing complex documents like macros.
Users will also be able to choose from a variety of different templates to add some visual flare to their documents, spreadsheets and presentations.
For number crunchers, Excel 2011 benefits from new features like Sparklines, which are thumbnail-sized charts that represent large volumes of data at a glance.
Adding media to PowerPoint 2011 has also been made easier with new tools like the photo-editing and document layout tools. Microsoft said the tools allow you to make simple changes to documents such as remove the background from a picture and manage stacked images by layers.
In addition Office 2011 for Mac will support online collaboration tools such as Windows Live SkyDrive and Microsoft Office Web Apps, which will allow Mac and Windows users to simultaneously edit documents over the Web.
Office 2011 for Mac will be available in two editions: Home & Student (RM468 for single install; RM599 for three installs) and Home & Business (RM768 for single install; RM1,099 for two installs).
Both editions will come with Word 2011Excel 2011 and PowerPoint 2011. However, only customers with the Home & Business edition will get Outlook 2011.

October 11, 2010

New features of Windows Phone 7 : reviewed

HTC 7 Mozart

On February 15, 2010, Microsoft Corp unveiled its Windows Phone 7 during the Mobile World Congress 2010 in Barcelona. While the new operating system could be the most significant for Microsoft since losing the lead in the smartphone market to RIM's BlackBerry, Apple's iOS devices and Google's Android operating system, the local launch was marred by the unavailability of certain key features that would have made Windows Phone 7 devices in this country more competitive.
This is unfortunate, because Microsoft's new smartphone operating system has a real chance of taking hold in the market, thanks to a well thought-out interface that has all the animation and flash of its rivals and yet looks completely unlike any of them.

New interface
For those who haven't seen the phone in action, Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 interface is made up of customisable "Tiles" which are active shortcuts to various applications - for example, the Outlook tile not only takes you to the application when tapped, but the tile itself will show users how many e-mail messages are unread.
Similarly, the People tile, which takes the user to the contacts list, also has constantly active thumbnails of people taken from the user's contacts list.
Tiles on the Home screen can be customised and the user can easily add (and remove) shortcuts to a variety of applications and even favourite websites.
Within this interface is a concept called "Hubs" which are essentially areas which hold collections of related tasks - for example, the People Hub not only allows users to access their contacts lists, but also to access each contact's Facebook photos and Windows Live feeds.
Then there's the Office Hub, which of course includes mobile versions of WordExcel andPowerPoint as well as OneNote, a new application in the mobile Office suite for note-taking on the go.
Microsoft's hardware partners like HTC, LG and Samsung are set to launch products based on Windows Phone 7 in the coming months.
HTC announced that it will be releasing its HD7 and Mozart models early next month. The HD7 has a retail price of RM2,399 and will be available exclusively from Maxis at a subsidised price with a plan. Meanwhile the Mozart will have a recommended retail price of RM2,099.
Hardware front
In an effort to avoid the fragmentation in hardware (CPU speeds, screen resolutions, etc) which resulted in vastly differing user experiences in the company's previous Windows Mobile operating system, Microsoft has this time set more stringent base hardware specifications for devices running on Windows Phone 7.
With Windows Phone 7, every device must run on a 1GHz Snapdragon processor, have a screen resolution of 480 x 800-pixels, have at least 8GB of storage and at least a 5-megapixel digital camera.
Missing Marketplace, Xbox Live
For Malaysians, however, the disappointing news could be that both Xbox Live and the Windows Phone Marketplace will not be available at launch.
For gamers, Xbox Live on Windows Phone 7 is one of its biggest draws, as the feature allows Xbox 360 console users with Xbox Live accounts to log in on Windows Phone 7 to customise their Xbox Avatars and even add to their achievement points for mobile games played on the smartphone.
While the unavailability of Xbox Live on Windows Phone 7 isn't that big a surprise considering that the Xbox 360 console itself isn't officially available in the country, the missing Windows Phone Marketplace, Microsoft's application store for the smartphone, may turn off some users.
According to Ananth Lazarus, managing director of Microsoft Malaysia, the missing features are "to be rolled out in the future," although no specific time-frame was given as to when this would be.
As it is, the missing Marketplace puts Windows Phone 7 at somewhat of a disadvantage, because the smartphone operating system itself has no Twitter application nor an instant messaging client like Windows Live Messenger built in.

September 29, 2010

Review of IE9 Beta Version




JAZZED UP: IE9, now available in beta test form, has a more minimalist look and promises to make websites load and run faster. - Microsoft Corp
The beta version of Microsoft's Internet Explorer 9(IE9) web browser is now available online for users to try out.
Sporting a much cleaner, less-cluttered layout than its predecessors, IE9 promises a speedier and better user experience, the company said.
It is however only available for Windows 7 and Vista operating systems. Not applicable for Win XP operating systems.

According to Microsoft, users can expect trusted and interoperable online experiences that take full advantage of Windows 7 capabilities as well as a tighter integration with the Bing search engine. It supports the HTML5 video and audio tags and the Web Open Font Format.
IE9 introduces a new scripting engine called Chakra that leverages on the common multicore processors in PCs to deliver significant performance gains.
Microsoft said Chakra has a separate background thread for compiling JavaScript and multiple threads can run in parallel, each on an individual core when one is available.
IE9 also supports full hardware acceleration of HTML5, which enables it to use the graphics processor when rendering complex pages, which takes a significant load off a PC's CPU.
On the security front, IE9 includes the SmartScreen Download Reputation feature that identifies safe downloads and will immediately alert users when it encounters untrustworthy files.
MORE SECURE: The In-Private Browsing and In-Private Filtering security features have been enhanced to give users added peace of mind. - Microsoft Corp
Meanwhile, the In-Private Browsing and In-Private Filtering security features have been further enhanced to give users added peace of mind when using the browser.
Other notable new features include a URL address box that doubles as a search bar just like in Google's Chrome browser, and Windows Taskbar integration that allows shortcuts to links or favourites to be pinned to the taskbar.
IE9 also features user alerts that are more discreet - instead of a steady stream of annoying pop-ups like in IE8, a bar will now appear at the bottom of the screen to ask users about what action to take.

August 17, 2010

Microsoft will launch more games on Windows Phone 7 platform for Xbox

NEW: Users with Windows Phone 7 handsets will be able to access their friends lists, game library and Xbox Live messages.
Microsoft will launch more and more games for mobile phones running its Windows Phone 7 operating system as the year goes on, unveiling 73 launch titles that integrate with the existing console service in one way or another.
Included in the roster are mobile versions of popular casual games UnoPuzzle Quest 2,Bejeweled, and Flight Control, as well as more traditional console fare such as Assassin's Creed,CastlevaniaGuitar Hero 5, and the blockbuster Halo series.
Integration with Xbox Live means that those with Windows Phone 7 handsets will be able to access their friends lists, game library, and Xbox Live messages.
Also included are leaderboard rankings and a cumulative, personal Gamerscore that can be increased via PC, Xbox 360, and mobile phone games that work with the Xbox Live service.
Latest estimates for Windows Phone 7's release indicate an October launch is most likely for European users, with United States joining in by November, though Microsoft has refrained from naming specific dates or, indeed, confirming anything beyond the 2010 holiday period.
Having elected to stand back from the handheld console market while Nintendo and Sony battled it out with their DS and PSP platforms, Microsoft looks well poised to leapfrog its console competitors, but face a tough challenge cutting through the established enthusiasm for Apple and Android handsets.
Given the buzz enjoyed by the iPhone 4 since its June release in the United States, and Google's march into the game space with its browser-based Web Store also targeting October, Microsoft need to come up with something special to cement its presence in the mobile entertainment sector - this could be just the foot in the door that it needs

August 16, 2010

Cheap mobile phones to gain high-powered operating systems

MOVING UP: Smartphone operating systems such as Google's Android are set to make their way onto China's cheap mobile phones. - Relaxnews
Mobile operating systems such as Google's Android, Nokia's Symbian and Microsoft's Windows Mobile are set to make their way onto China's cheap mobile phones.
Chinese-based consumer electronics seller Chinavasion predicts that the shift from proprietary mobile phone operating systems to open-sourced operating systems will completely change China's mobile phone market, creating new opportunities for China's mobile manufacturers.
"We are looking at what is potentially the most exciting development in the cheap mobile phone sector in years," said Rose Li, PR manager, Chinavasion in a statement.

Chinese-made devices priced at less than US$130 (RM416) have typically been powered by the Nucleus real-time operating system (RTOS), but with the advent of open-source operating systems, manufacturers are now starting to make the shift.
"While the Nucleus RTOS is a very capable OS it doesn't have nearly the same potential that Windows, or Android or Symbian has," explained Rose Li.
For consumers the change means they may soon see smartphone-like features such as PC syncing, productivity tools, online browsing, email, and customisable phone applications on low-end mobile phones.
An August study by market research ABI suggests that by 2015 more than 60% (about 3.8 billion handsets) of mobile phones worldwide will be capable of surfing the Internet via a mobile web browser.

December 24, 2009

The best technologies of the decade


With only few days left before we enter a new year, a lot of new technologies has been explored by us since last decade. The fastest growing technologies is in ICT. Below are the best of technologies so far that we can consider as the best within years period of time;
AJAX
It’s hard to remember what life was like before Asynchronous JavaScript and XML came along, so I’ll prod your memory. It was boring. Web 1.0 consisted of a lot of static web pages, where every mouse click was a round trip to the web server. If you wanted rich content, you had to embed a Java applet in the page, and pray that the client browser supported it.
Without the advent of AJAX, we wouldn’t have Web 2.0, GMail, or most of the other cloud-based web applications. Flash is still popular, but especially with HTML 5 on the way, even functionality that formerly required a RIA like Flash or Silverlight can now be accomplished with AJAX.
Twitter
When they first started, blogs were just what they said, web logs. In other words, a journal of interesting web sites that the author had encountered. These days, blogs are more like platforms for rants, opinions, essays, and anything else on the writer’s mind. Then along came Twitter. Sure, people like to find out what J-Lo had for dinner, but the real power of the 140 character dynamo is that it has brought about a resurgence of real web logging. The most useful tweets consist of a Tiny URL and a little bit of context. Combine that with the use of Twitter to send out real time notices about everything from breaking news to the current specials at the corner restaurant, and it’s easy to see why Twitter has become a dominant player.
Ubiquitous WiFi
I want you to imagine you’re on the road in the mid-90s. You get to your hotel room, and plop your laptop on the table. Then you get out your handy RJ-11 cord, and check to see if the hotel phone has a data jack (most didn’t), or if you’ll have to unplug the phone entirely. Then you’d look up the local number for your ISP, and have your laptop dial it, so you could suck down your e-mail at an anemic 56K.
Now, of course, WiFi is everywhere. You may end up having to pay for it, but fast Internet connectivity is available everywhere from your local McDonalds to your hotel room to an airport terminal. Of course, this is not without its downsides, since unsecured WiFi access points have led to all sorts of security headaches, and using an open access point is a risky proposition unless your antivirus software is up to date, but on the whole, ubiquitous WiFi has made the world a much more connected place.
Phones Get Smarter
In the late 90s, we started to see the first personal digital assistants emerge, but this has been the decade when the PDA and the cell phone got married and had a baby called the smartphone. Palm got the ball rolling with the Treos about the same time that Windows Mobile started appearing on phones, and RIM’s Blackberry put functional phones in the hands of business, but it was Apple that took the ball and ran for the touchdown with the iPhone. You can argue if the droid is better than the 3GS or the Pre, but the original iPhone was the game-changer that showed what a smartphone really could do, including the business model of the App Store,
The next convergence is likely to be with Netbooks, as more and more of the mini-laptops come with 3G service integrated in them, and VoIP services such as Skype continue to eat into both landline and cellular business.
Open Source Goes Mainstream
Aha..this is what I like most. Quick! Name 5 open source pieces of software you might have had on your computer in 1999. Don’t worry I’ll wait…
How about today? Firefox is an easy candidate, as are Open Office, Chrome, Audacity, Eclipse (if you’re a developer), Blender, VLC, and many others. Many netbooks now ship with Linux as the underlying OS. Open Source has gone from a rebel movement to part of the establishment, and when you combine increasing end user adoption with the massive amounts of FLOSS you find on the server side, it can be argued that it is the 800 pound Gorilla now.
As Gandhi said, “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” When even Microsoft is releasing Open Source code, you know that you’re somewhere between the fight and win stages.
Toward giant Resources
56K modems, 20MB hard drives, 640K of RAM, 2 MHz processors. You don’t have to go far back in time for all of these to represent the state of the art. Now, of course, you would have more than that in a good toaster…
Moore’s Law continues to drive technology innovation at a breakneck pace, and it seems that related technologies like storage capacity and bandwidth are trying to follow the same curve. Consider that AT&T users gripe about the iPhone’s 5GB/month bandwidth cap, a limit that would have taken 10 solid days of transferring to achieve with a dialup connection.
A iPhone has 3,200 times the storage of the first hard drive I ever owned, and the graphics card on Mac Pro has 16,000 times the memory of my first computer. We can now do amazing things in the palm of our hands, things that would have seemed like science fiction in 1999.

Windows 7 - New transform from slumpy Vista product or backward roadmap?


windows-seven.jpg
Microsoft has recently announced a new baby birth from Microsoft family, called Windows 7, which will be a predecessor for Windows Vista and Xp soon. Well, hearing this kind of thing would give a lot in mind. Why they have to come with new windows product very soon? Is the vista not good enough to sustain the requirement of global need? or the XP already run out of petrol so then they cannot boost further?

windows-7.png
Any of the answer you might have if you browse the google website a little deep further. Most of the internet savvy said that the Vista is suck!. Is it true? Well, some is right and some of the little is not really actually. At the first time when Vista is launched, the current hardware cannot support this giant truck. Just imagine a giant Bigfoot try to walk on the half lane road. Really slow right. In fact, not as claimed by brother gates from Microsoft, who said that This kitty Vista will finely run with single Core and 512 MB RAM, the Windows vista only can really work with Quad core 9300 series together with more than 2 GB RAM. Off course, you have to count enhanced display also, like HD 4850 or Nvidia 8600GT for minimum optimal performance and . Then this giant can run as fast as windows Xp as it is full with petrol and boosted by hydrogen + nitrogen + turbo charger. The price? That actually the main factor why this giant vista still walking in the darkness. Don`t surprise if some of people out there call VIsta as Me of NT.
Then, why this Windows 7 come out so soon? This is because Microsoft sees that people are starting to look into other alternative , like Ubuntu, or just simply go back to Windows Xp, which really can promise on stability and great performance even though its kernel safety is really suck no matter how many patch you fed him. Not good investment and reputation right?So, This Windows 7 will come out with lesser memory consumption while still remain the vista look. See? This is Microsoft. Sell it. see what happen. “Oh! got problem”.then come out with new backward thing in 2010. Done.
windows-vs-linux.jpg

December 2, 2009

Critical Vulnerability in Microsoft Server Message Block (SMB)


I know this alert has been out for about a month.. but i’m pretty sure MANY of the windows user out there are not aware of this. This is still ‘panas’ as many of those who knew this will try on the local network to see the results.
If you think you are not affected, think again. List of windows operating systems that are vulnerable:
* Windows Vista Service Pack 0, Service Pack 1 and Service Pack 2
* Windows Vista x64 Edition Service Pack 0, Service Pack 1 and Service Pack 2
* Windows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 0 and Service Pack 2
* Windows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems, Service Pack 0 and Service Pack 2
* Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-based, Service Pack 0 and Service Pack 2

this probably including the Windows 7 versions. Users are advice to follow steps here
or install the fix by microsoft here

You’ve been warned

Sponsored Link
Sponsored Link

September 16, 2009

Business War : Microsoft vs Linux

Microsoft is apparently teaching Best Buy employees that Windows 7 beats Linux in every category imaginable. At this point, everything looks fine. Microsoft is simply going to explain the pros of running Windows over Linux.

windows_linux_bb_3.png

First we see, according to Microsoft, that Linux has poor support for cameras, iPods and MP3s. Really? Have they tried to compare with Linux Audio player such as Audacious, Banshee, BMP (Beep Media Player), Amarok. Read more Linux audio information. Click here.

Microsoft also claims that Linux user can’t use video chat on desktop Linux. Is it really true ? Linux can run Ekiga and Skype for video chat on Linux all the time. How about Windows Live ? Does Linux user really need that application ? I don’t know… :) Linux doesn’t offer free downloads? Hello !!… The actual operating system is a free download!

windows_linux_bb_9.png

This is where Microsoft should have stopped. Linux does indeed offer a ton of updates, and they’re easy to download and install.

windows_linux_bb_10.png

This is probably the most controversial part of all the slides. Microsoft has somehow managed to imply, without actually saying it, that Windows 7 is more secure than Linux.


Look, nobody’s saying Linux is perfect for every consumer (or even most), but Microsoft’s “training material” for Best Buy employees casts the open source operating system in a bit of a bad light — and isn’t exactly accurate.

What is it with Microsoft? What wrong with giant Microsoft ? Why are they so frightened of desktop Linux that they have to resort to this kind of propaganda? Maybe Microsoft knows something that most of its Windows users don’t: given a fair shot, many users would switch to Linux. I dont know what Microsoft was attempting to accomplish with this, I bet they spent way more money on this campaign than they were losing from Linux sales.

Source : ERM Blog

April 2, 2009

IT Security Alert : Beware of "CONFICKER.C" Worm

The worm Conficker.C has been activated on 1st April 2009.

The worm when infects the PC will query about 30,000 websites for further instructions, thus when the PC queries 30,000 sites your Network most probably will be congested and users will be experiencing high latency in internet.


1. WHAT is the symptoms:

    So far, the worm is new, there's no unique signature, but basically, look for these:
   * task manager disabled
   * regedit disabled
   * user cannot view my network
   * network is up, but microsoft sites and all antivirus sites cannot be open


2. HOW to avoid..
 For Microsoft users,  please follow link below
 http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms08-067.mspx


3.HOW to clean the worms
     Refer to table below

Removal Instructions
Microsoft:  http://support.microsoft.com/kb/962007
Kaspersky:  http://support.kaspersky.com/faq/
BitDefender: http://www.bitdefender.com/VIRUS-1000462-en--Win32.Worm.Downadup.Gen.html
TrendMicro: http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp

To be able to access Anti-Virus vendors and SANS, Microsoft and others, from an infected Conficker.C machine, TrendMicro suggests to use "net stop dnscache" from the command line.
Sophos:  http://www.sophos.com/support/knowledgebase/article/51416.html

Removal Tools

Microsoft MSRT:  http://www.microsoft.com/security/malwareremove/default.mspx
F-Secure:  ftp://ftp.f-secure.com/anti-virus/tools/beta/f-downadup.zip
AhnLab:  http://global.ahnlab.com/global/file_removeal_down.jsp?filename=12371830475821&down_filename=v3conficker.zip
Symantec:  http://www.symantec.com/business/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2009-011316-0247-99
McAfee:  http://vil.nai.com/vil/stinger/
ESET:  http://download.eset.com/special/EConfickerRemover.exe
BitDefender:  http://www.bdtools.net/
Kaspersky:  http://data2.kaspersky-labs.com:8080/special/KidoKiller_v3.3.3.zip
TrendMicro:  https://securecloud.com/support/sysclean
Sophos:  https://secure.sophos.com/products/free-tools/conficker-removal-tool-network/download (registration required)

Other Related Post About Conficker.C : ERM Blog

November 10, 2008

Windows 7 versus Linux : over the netbook market

You can be sure when Microsoft blitzes the world with a massive advertising campaign for Windows 7, they’ll be spending many millions promoting Windows 7 on netbooks. And given that marketing muscle, Linux most likely won’t stand a chance, regardless of which operating system is superior. (More reasons Windows 7 will kill Linux)

AND

Windows 7 features a much slicker interface than Windows XP, is easier to use, and Microsoft will spend many millions of dollars to push its use on netbooks. So when it’s released, expect Linux use on netbooks to drop. (One more reason Linux must fear Windows 7)



Both quotes mentioned above obviously biased to Windows 7. It sounds like Windows 7 is really confident to make bold claim that they're able to monopolize the worldwide netbook share. Are they able to make it happen or it is just a marketing strategy only. Microsoft exaggerating their strength. As we know Linux will continue to be a Linux... and no matter how much money Microsoft spends or what Windows 7 does. If we really drill down the term of Linux, it could be Suse, Ubuntu, Fedora, Redhat and etc community. Each Linux community progressively develop their own best product. Linux will not going away unless, one day the worldwide Linux community decides to disperse and stop developing and growing... and also shutdown all the Linux forum. Hmmmm... another mission impossible (MI-IV) for Microsoft. The possibility for them to stop is very... very... small and probably negligible.

November 4, 2008

The Forrester Wave NAC, Q3 2008 Report not totally reflect the real NAC competition

I've read report of "The Forrester Wave™: Network Access Control, Q3 2008" prepared by Robert Whiteley and Usman Sindhu for Security. It was reported on September 5, 2008. The executive summary of the report wrote:

In Forrester’s 73-criteria evaluation of network access control (NAC) vendors, we found that Microsoft, Cisco Systems, Bradford Networks, and Juniper Networks lead the pack because of their strong enforcement and policy. Microsoft’s NAP technology is a relative newcomer, but has become the de facto standard and pushes NAC into its near-ubiquitous Windows Server customer base. Cisco’s and Juniper’s NAC solutions are anchored by mature, standalone appliances with top marks for manageability and ease of use. Bradford has pushed into the enterprise space with one of the most scalable overlay solutions. Symantec, McAfee, and StillSecure are all close behind with software-based solutions, which we predict will ultimately win as the best NAC architecture. Mirage Networks’ unique out-of-band system provides superior deployment flexibility and just edges out Nevis Networks, which operates as a secure inline switch with built-in threat prevention. HP ProCurve Networking rounds out the bunch with an approach that marries appliance with Ethernet switches.


I think Forrester forgot to include a few good product in their benchmarking evaluation such as InfoExpress, Consentry and Fortinet. To counter this report, I believe base on my previous experience evaluating NAC requirement, Cisco NAC and Microsoft NAC are not the answer for a comprehensive ubiquitous NAC solution. The way they deploy their NAC Architecture, would not solve major wireless architectural problem. These two devices depend on port base security. Meaning that, any traffic in-out activity from that NAC switch port can be analyzed and monitored only via that physical port. Imagine that if you have 1000 devices in your company. You have to replace all your conventional switches to this NAC switches. My estimation, you need to deploy about 42 NAC appliances to monitor and control every access in your network.

I would prefer a solution provided by Juniper, Bradford, InfoExpress and Consentry. These NAC able to solve many issues logged by WLAN architecture. Their solutions are more.. and more comprehensive for ubiquitous network.

To address many complicated issues in the NAC management of heterogeneous WLAN network, I would prefer solution from InfoExpress, Consentry and Bradford. The deployment architecture of these NAC are less dependent on proprietary configuration. Juniper solution too dependent on their JUAC that requires Odyssey Client. My concent is... the Odyssey client is too complicated to manage for non-IT literate (Non-IT savvy) user. I need to find a solution that could minimize the complexity on the end-user site when deploying NAC appliance. In order to make the Juniper NAC to perform well, every user must install Odyssey client on their devices (Laptop). Does all wifi enable device support odyssey client ? SmartPhone, PDA, PSP and many other wifi devices is not really workable with Odyssey. Can we install Odyssey Client on Windows Mobile Platform or Symbian or etc ?... These are the issues that we need to consider before we deploy NAC in our wireless environment.

So, which solution is less proprietary dependent and workable with many platform ? This time I would prefer a solution from InfoExpress, Consentry and Bradford. Two products were not evaluated in the Forrester report. How about Bradford ? since Forrester has discussed much about Bradford in their report, no point for to me to discuss about Bradford... then, I will highlight my review for InfoExpress and COnsentry. Generally, Consentry has similar features offered by Bradford. There are some minor differences which I think not really important to discuss. In general Consentry can act as a proxy radius to control the access for each user account. It also workable for inline deployment.

InfoExpress offers more unique solution compared to other NAC, especially for heterogeneous ubiquitous network. InfoExpress perform dynamic NAC solution which similarly follow the concept "Man in the middle attack". The total concept and approach they implement for dynamic NAC (DNAC) is very impressive. They are the first introducing DNAC solution and this method meet many end-user requirement especially to protect back-door attack via wireless connection.

The other NAC which include in Forrester report is more to AntiVirus NAC such as McAfee and Symantec. These type of NAC cannot be compare apple-to-apple with Juniper NAC, Cisco NAC or Microsoft NAC because they fall into different categories. AntiVirus NAC has different objection compared to port base NAC or the real network based NAC. If your look at the other NAC features, their can integrate with other third party antivirus server or appliance such as BigFix to update and control antivirus.

My conclusion, I don't understand why Forrester not include InfoExpress and Consentry in their evaluation report. That's why the Q3 2008 report produced by Forrester does not showing the actuall scenario about NAC technology available in the market. The evaluation criteria chosen to identify the market leader in NAC seems like biased to certain products only.

I would to see is there head-to-head evaluation between Cisco, Juniper, InfoExprees, COnsentry and Bradford in solving network access on real ubiquitous network.
free counters
RP | CU | PH | RR | TCU | MFB | BM | BM | TAW | RM | SM | MLW | QL | QTS | SR | TR | TCR | HR I2U | PH | TAW | ID | AAB | FSB | AG |