Showing posts with label Palm Pre. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Palm Pre. Show all posts

October 24, 2010

List of Top 10 Ten World Best SmartPhone 2010

01 Apple iPhone 4

Apple iPhone 4The king of smartphones is reborn, but does the fourth incarnation of the iPhone do enough to stop gadgeteers from signing up to the Android army?

02 HTC Desire  

HTC DesireThe latest A-list Android smartie is here with a big AMOLED screen and HTC Sense. But can the Desire match the Nexus One?

03 Samsung Galaxy S

Samsung Galaxy SThe Galaxy S takes the familiar iPhone format and tries to improve it with some eye-catching screen tech. But has it worked?

04 HTC Legend  

The aluminium Legend is the successor to HTC's Hero and runs the latest version of Android. But does it live up to its name?

05 HTC Touch HD2

HTC Touch HD2The HD2 gives Windows Mobile a serious lick of paint and a capacitive touch screen. Should the iPhone be worried?

06 Nokia E72  

 Nokia E72The ultra slimline Nokia E71 broke BlackBerry’s monopoly on mobile email. Can its successor continue its good work ?

07 BlackBerry Bold 9700 

BlackBerry Bold 9700The BlackBerry Bold was one of the world’s finest messaging smartphones. But is its successor, the fitter, leaner looking 9700, a worthy successor?

08 Sony Ericsson Xperia X 10  

Sony Ericsson Xperia X10Sony Ericsson's first Android mobile is a headlong dive into the waters of Google's OS. But can it match Google's Nexus One?

09 Palm Pre   

It’s smarter than the average phone but has the Palm Pre got what it takes to topple the mighty iPhone 3G S?

10 Samsung Wave   

Samsung WaveWith an eye-grabbing screen, HD video and a catwalk-slim design, Samsung’s first Bada OS phone has the iPhone 4 in its sights

December 9, 2009

Palm Pre : When they try to mix Iphone and Android




The first time I say the Palm pre, I was thinking in myself, could they beat Iphone ? emmm…not yet…Android? emmm…sort off..but still need have alot of improvement….

The Palm Pre is a lot smaller than I thpught it suppose to be. A good size comparison would be an iPod classic with a big hard drive. In terms of thickness, it’s definitely not as thin as the iPhone, or even the bold, but it’s an acceptable size considering it’s a slider.
The Pre’s Web OS UI and and UX really looks great. After watching (and using) for 20 minutes, It rarely looked (or felt) unresponsive, choppy, or laggy and it’s clear a lot of thought was put into the design, especially with regard to how the phone would be used with fingers, as opposed to a stylus or d-pad
The Card system is really a great way to keep your information in front of you and know what you’re working on. When you launch an app, you can drag it onto your phone desktop to create a new card, then when you’re finished with a card for a specific app, closing it is as simple as flicking the card upwards.
The input technology that doesn’t involve the screen is also top notch. Palm created the gesture bar, which is the black surface under the screen, because they found it was too hard to control a touchscreen phone with one hand, especially when trying to reach the upper part of the screen. The Gesture Bar streamlines some of the navigation so you can use the phone on the go.
There’s also an accelrometer that works with apps like the web browser and photo viewer, which automatically rotates the screen depending on its orientation. It’s the same as what’s on many other phones, but it’s worth noting that the accelerometer works quite well.
If you’re working in a specific app, you can drag your finger up from the Gesture Bar to the screen, hold it for a second, and the wave dock will appear, making it easy to quick launch another app. The trackball, which feels similar to that of the G1 and Blackberry phones, provides another quick way to get around the Web OS interface.
There’s also the keyboard. It pretty much looks and feels the same as previous Palm keyboards of late, which isn’t spectacular, but it works well enough. When asked why they opted to go with the vertically oriented slide out keyboard, Palm had two main reasons—they didn’t see much less of a difference in effectiveness when compared to a horizontal slider, and found that more people messaged holding the phone vertically. Second, they said there aren’t really any other smartphones with a vertical QWERTY slider, so it makes the phone more recognizable.
While the hardware is definitely high quality, I’m not entirely blown away by the design. It looks really nice, and original, but it’s a little too cutesy in shape and kind of reminds me of an oversized pebble. A slightly larger screen could have definitely been put to good use, and I really don’t like the black space on the side’s of the screen.
I think this phone’s biggest appeal will be the central role the internet plays in the OS. The way it pulls data from various web services, and melds it into its own framework is top notch. I think being able to text, and gChat and send IMs over AIM all from the same window is such a benefit to the user to not have to switch windows for 3 different apps for messaging. And obviously, you won’t be talking to someone on a bunch of different messengers at once, but over a period of a week, you might have convos over these different services, and it’s good to keep track of all these interactions in one place.
The browser is also a far cry from Blazer that was on the Treo’s Garnet OS. The new browser is built on top of Webkit, just like the Android and iPhone browsers, and renders full pages in under 10 seconds. The zoom and drag/pan functionality is very much like the other browsers, both in operation and feel. There was no glitchiness and the browser was extremely responsive.
I also love the way you can search for something on your phone, and then shoot that same query up to Google or Wikipedia without having to launch your web browser. It’s another way the internet has subtly worked its way into the phone without being constricted to a specific app or browser.
The design influence of the iPhone OS is definitely apparent in Web OS. The App dock that sits at the bottom of the home screen is definitely a page out of the iPhones playbook, and for good reason—it works well. The design of the menus such as the contacts list take that same simple approach of not showing more than you absolutely see on any one page, something the iPhone perfected.
The screen is beautiful, and it really shows when looking at photos, which are so bright and colorful, I’d almost say it looks sharper than any other phone.
The camera takes really beautiful photos as well. Even in lighting that wasn’t super bright, colors came out rich, and though a little grainy, it didn’t suffer the same washed out, sandy look that other camera phones generate. This is also due in part to some image post processing that takes place behind the scenes of the camera app.
As far as video recording goes, it’s not available on the Pre for now, but it’s something Palm is looking at for future upgrades. I find this slightly disappointing, because Palm is touting this as an internet phone, and user generated video is a very big part of what’s going on in the online world. A feature where you could live stream or auto upload to YouTube seems like an idea that fits in with the Pre philosophy. I think this absolutely has to be added in the next year.
The Apps and SDK for Web OS i think will be promising. Palm will make the SDK available to anyone to use, but there will be an App Store which will be accessible on the phone only and an approval process for apps. Palm says there are always exceptions, but they will not play the role of Big Brother so much when it comes to apps. What they are mostly concerned with are the security and stability of the apps. Making sure there aren’t apps that crash or provide holes for their phones to be hacked. They also say they will work close with select partners on app and give them access to deeper areas of the OS that are not available in the SDK.
Like Android, there is an Amazon music store app that looks and smells very similar to that on the G1. It lets you preview songs, as well as download from the same screen.
It also has a few features not found on the iPhone, which include copy and paste and MMS messaging, something hardcore iPhone users have been clamoring for since its introduction.

June 23, 2009

Technical Comparison: iPhone 3GS vs. 3G vs Palm Pre


After the announcement of the iPhone 3GS of the hardware specs of the 3GS. Here we outlined the single chip CPU/GPU SoC as follows:
iPhone 3G (ARM11)
iPhone 3GS (ARM Cortex A8)
Manufacturing Process
90nm
65nm
Architecture
In-Order
In-Order
Issue Width
1-issue
2-issue
Pipeline Depth
8-stage
13-stage
Clock Speed
412MHz
600MHz
L1 Cache Size
16KB I-Cache + 16KB D-Cache
32KB I-Cache + 32KB D-Cache
L2 Cache Size
N/A
256KB
The iPhone 3GS uses an ARM Cortex A8 processor running at 600MHz, much like the Palm Pre. Many weren’t confident that the 3GS used the new ARM A8 core instead of a higher clocked ARM11

WiFi
Apple iPhone 3G
Apple iPhone 3GS
Palm Pre
T-Mobile G1
anandtech.com
16.3 s
7.8 s
8.2 s
17.2 s
arstechnica.com
17.7 s
6.3 s
7.8 s
17.8 s
hothardware.com
35.2 s
14.7 s
11.2 s
24.4 s
pcper.com
33.3 s
15.0 s
18.0 s
34.0 s
digg.com
34.3 s
15.0 s
22.1 s
40.0 s
techreport.com
24.1 s
9.6 s
9.0 s
20.5 s
tomshardware.com
21.4 s
16.4 s
13.8 s
26.0 s
slashdot.org
26.0 s
10.0 s
20.9 s
46.0 s
facebook.com
31.7 s
13.5 s
19.6 s
37.7 s
iPhone 3GS Advantage over Palm Pre
21%
iPhone 3GS Advantage over iPhone 3G
122%
The new 3GS renders web pages 128% faster, on average, than the old iPhone 3G. The 45% clock speed boost alone isn’t enough to generate such a large performance increase, this is a new microarchitecture. Also, note that the 3GS’ performance mimics that of the Palm Pre - another Cortex A8 based phone.

Not too surprising given the just-released nature of the Pre’s webOS, the 3GS is actually able to render webpages slightly faster than the Pre in some cases. The overall performance advantage ends up being 22.6% in favor of the 3GS over the Pre.
Application launch time has also improved :
Application Launch Time in Seconds
Web Browser
Dialer
Google Maps
Camera
Email
Apple iPhone 3GS
0.7 s
0.7 s
2.7 s
2.8 s
0.8 s
Apple iPhone 3G
0.8 s
1.2 s
3.3 s
3.9 s
1.2 s
Palm Pre
3.0 s
1.5 s
8.6 s
4.4 s
3.3 s
T-Mobile G1
5.4 s
2.0 s
4.4 s
4.9 s
2.0 s
iPhone 3GS vs. 3G Performance Advantage
14%
71.5%
22.2%
39.4%
50%
While the old iPhone 3G was no slouch, the 3GS is anywhere from 14 - 72% faster in basic application load times. It’s the magic of a brand new CPU architecture.

Source: ERM Blog
This is the gadget that I would recommed for IIUM wireless users to get connected through SSID iium-gadget. In addition, Blackberry also has almost similar performance with iPhone. You can feel the real performance of IIUM campus wide infrastructure. So far, Windows Mobile based phone still not recommended because it will drop the backward compatibility of default wifi 802.11g technology. Standard handphone running on wifi 802.11b and it will change the nearby channel to 11b instead of 11g. ITD will not tolerate to open the access for any gadget that able to down grade the nearby performance. If you own an iPhone or Blackberry, you are welcome to register for iium-gadget access.
For Symbion and Windows Mobile users, wait until new development. So far, even T-Mobile G1 performance, it take 5.4s to launch a web browser. Next time, before you purchase your handphone… carefully check the hadrware spec for clock speed, processor and cache size.
Click Here for Side by Side Comparison iPhone 3Gs VS Nokia N900
free counters
RP | CU | PH | RR | TCU | MFB | BM | BM | TAW | RM | SM | MLW | QL | QTS | SR | TR | TCR | HR I2U | PH | TAW | ID | AAB | FSB | AG |